Log in

Language Lab

52 fixes

Confusable pairs

been vs gone
A2
incorrect: She has gone to Rome twice.correct: She has been to Rome twice.
PL„Has gone” znaczy, że pojechała i wciąż tam jest; „has been” — że była i wróciła. O doświadczeniach mówimy „been”.EN“Has gone” means she went and is still there; “has been” — she went and came back. For experiences, use “been”.
incorrect: Where have you gone? (to someone standing right there)correct: Where have you been?

Tip Been = a return ticket, gone = one-way.

lend vs borrow
A2
incorrect: Can you borrow me your pen?correct: Can you lend me your pen?
PL„Lend” to pożyczyć komuś, „borrow” — pożyczyć od kogoś. To ten sam moment widziany z dwóch stron.EN“Lend” is to give a loan, “borrow” is to take one. Same moment, seen from opposite sides.
incorrect: Can I lend your pen?correct: Can I borrow your pen?

Tip Lend → away from you, borrow → towards you.

say vs tell
A2
incorrect: He said me the truth.correct: He told me the truth.
PL„Tell” łączy się z osobą bez przyimka (tell me), „say” — bez odbiorcy albo z „to” (say to me).EN“Tell” takes the person directly (tell me); “say” takes no listener, or needs “to” (say to me).
incorrect: She told that she was tired.correct: She said that she was tired.
remind vs remember
B1
incorrect: Remember me to call her.correct: Remind me to call her.
PL„Remind” to przypomnieć komuś o czymś; „remember” — pamiętać samemu. Prosisz kogoś, więc „remind”.EN“Remind” is to jog someone else's memory; “remember” is to keep something in your own. You're asking someone, so it's “remind”.
teach vs learn
A2
incorrect: She learned me English.correct: She taught me English.
PL„Teach” to uczyć kogoś, „learn” — uczyć się. Nauczyciel teaches, uczeń learns.EN“Teach” is to instruct someone; “learn” is to acquire it yourself. The teacher teaches, the student learns.
accept vs agree
B1
incorrect: My father accepted to pick me up from the airport.correct: My father agreed to pick me up from the airport.
PL„Accept” przyjmuje rzeczy — zaproszenie, ofertę, pracę — i nigdy nie łączy się z drugim czasownikiem. Zgoda na zrobienie czegoś to „agree to do”.EN“Accept” takes things — an invitation, an offer, a job — and never pairs with another verb. Saying yes to doing something is “agree to do”.
incorrect: They offered me the job and I accepted to take it.correct: They offered me the job and I accepted it.

Collocations

big vs great
B1
incorrect: My work is of big importance to me.correct: My work is of great importance to me.
PL„Big” opisuje rozmiar rzeczy policzalnych (a big house, a big room). Z pojęciami abstrakcyjnymi — progress, fun, importance, excitement — łączy się „great”.EN“Big” describes the size of countable things (a big house, a big room). Abstract nouns — progress, fun, importance, excitement — pair with “great”.
incorrect: We made big progress.correct: We made great progress.

Tip With a countable, “great” shifts meaning: a great party = very good, a big party = large.

do vs make
A2
incorrect: I should make more exercise.correct: I should do more exercise.
PL„Do” to wykonywanie czynności lub pracy: do exercise, do homework, do an apprenticeship. „Make” — tworzenie czegoś: make a dress, make a film, make dinner.EN“Do” is performing an activity or job: do exercise, do homework, do an apprenticeship. “Make” is creating something: make a dress, make a film, make dinner.
incorrect: Did you do the dress yourself?correct: Did you make the dress yourself?
have vs take
A2
incorrect: I usually take breakfast at eight.correct: I usually have breakfast at eight.
PLPosiłki i napoje „się ma”: have breakfast, have a coffee, have dinner. „Take” pasuje do pauz i zabiegów — take a break, take a shower.ENMeals and drinks take “have”: have breakfast, have a coffee, have dinner. “Take” fits pauses and routines — take a break, take a shower.
incorrect: I'll take a coffee, please.correct: I'll have a coffee, please.

Tip With shower / bath / break both work: have (BrE) and take (AmE). With food, “have” wins.

Articles

a/an + profession
A1
incorrect: She is teacher.correct: She is a teacher.
PLNazwy zawodów w liczbie pojedynczej wymagają przedimka: a teacher, an engineer, a doctor.ENSingular professions need an article: a teacher, an engineer, a doctor.
life, nature, love…
A2
incorrect: The life is beautiful.correct: Life is beautiful.
PLUogólnienia o pojęciach — life, nature, love, music — idą bez „the”. „The” zawęża do konkretu: the life of Bowie.ENGeneralisations about concepts — life, nature, love, music — take no “the”. “The” narrows it down: the life of Bowie.
incorrect: I love the nature.correct: I love nature.
last / next + time
A2
incorrect: I saw him the last week.correct: I saw him last week.
PLPo „last” i „next” z określeniem czasu nie ma przedimka: last week, next year, next Monday.EN“Last” and “next” with a time word take no article: last week, next year, next Monday.
to work, to bed, at home
A2
incorrect: I go to the work by bus.correct: I go to work by bus.
PLW utartych zwrotach o funkcji miejsca przedimek znika: go to work, go to bed, be at home, go to school.ENSet phrases about a place's function drop the article: go to work, go to bed, be at home, go to school.

Countable or not

information, advice
A2
incorrect: Thank you for these informations.correct: Thank you for this information.
PL„Information” jest niepoliczalne — nie ma formy „informations”. Jedna porcja to „a piece of information”.EN“Information” is uncountable — “informations” doesn't exist. One unit is “a piece of information”.
incorrect: She gave me some advices.correct: She gave me some advice.
news is
B1
incorrect: The news are good.correct: The news is good.
PL„News” wygląda jak liczba mnoga, ale łączy się z liczbą pojedynczą: the news is, no news is good news.EN“News” looks plural but takes a singular verb: the news is, no news is good news.
many vs much
A1
incorrect: How much people were there?correct: How many people were there?
PL„Many” z policzalnymi (people, things), „much” z niepoliczalnymi (time, money, water).EN“Many” goes with countables (people, things), “much” with uncountables (time, money, water).
incorrect: I have so much things to do.correct: I have so many things to do.
fewer vs less
B1
incorrect: There were less cars on the road.correct: There were fewer cars on the road.
PL„Fewer” z policzalnymi, „less” z niepoliczalnymi. W mowie „less” bywa wszędzie, ale staranny język tę różnicę trzyma.EN“Fewer” for countables, “less” for uncountables. Casual speech uses “less” everywhere, but careful English keeps the line.

Tip The supermarket's “10 items or less” has been breaking this rule for decades.

all kinds of
A2
incorrect: I like listening to all kind of music.correct: I like listening to all kinds of music.
PLPo słowach mnogich — all, these, many — „kind” też jest w liczbie mnogiej: all kinds of, these kinds of, many kinds of.ENAfter plural words — all, these, many — “kind” goes plural too: all kinds of, these kinds of, many kinds of.
progress (no a, no -es)
B1
incorrect: I have made a great progress in speaking English.correct: I have made great progress in speaking English.
PL„Progress” jest niepoliczalne — bez „a” i bez liczby mnogiej. Ilość wyraża się przez some / a lot of progress.EN“Progress” is uncountable — no “a”, no plural. Amounts take some / a lot of progress.
incorrect: A lot of progresses still need to be made.correct: A lot of progress still needs to be made.
equipment, a piece of
B1
incorrect: We need to order more office equipments.correct: We need to order more office equipment.
PL„Equipment” nie ma liczby mnogiej ani „a/an”. Pojedyncza sztuka to „a piece of equipment”.EN“Equipment” has no plural and takes no “a/an”. One item is “a piece of equipment”.
incorrect: A knife is a useful equipment for camping.correct: A knife is a useful piece of equipment for camping.
knowledge (no -s)
B1
incorrect: I'd like to improve my knowledges of English grammar.correct: I'd like to improve my knowledge of English grammar.
PL„Knowledge” nie ma liczby mnogiej: some knowledge, a lot of knowledge.EN“Knowledge” has no plural: some knowledge, a lot of knowledge.
incorrect: The staff have acquired a lot of knowledges on the subject.correct: The staff have acquired a lot of knowledge on the subject.

Tip With an adjective the “a” returns: a good / deep knowledge of history.

Tenses

yesterday → past simple
A2
incorrect: I have seen him yesterday.correct: I saw him yesterday.
PLOkreślony moment przeszłości — yesterday, last week, in 2019 — wymaga past simple, nie present perfect.ENA finished, dated moment — yesterday, last week, in 2019 — takes the past simple, not the present perfect.
since 2019 → present perfect
B1
incorrect: I live here since 2019.correct: I have lived here since 2019.
PLSytuacja, która zaczęła się w przeszłości i trwa do teraz, bierze present perfect: I have lived, I have worked.ENA situation that started in the past and continues now takes the present perfect: I have lived, I have worked.
when I arrive (no will)
B1
incorrect: I'll call you when I will arrive.correct: I'll call you when I arrive.
PLPo „when”, „if”, „until” w zdaniach o przyszłości stoi present simple — „will” zostaje w zdaniu głównym.ENAfter “when”, “if”, “until” in future sentences comes the present simple — “will” stays in the main clause.
know, want, need…
B1
incorrect: I am knowing the answer.correct: I know the answer.
PLCzasowniki stanu — know, want, need, like, believe — rzadko występują w formie continuous.ENState verbs — know, want, need, like, believe — rarely take the continuous form.
incorrect: I am wanting a coffee.correct: I want a coffee.

Prepositions

depends on
A2
incorrect: It depends of the weather.correct: It depends on the weather.
PLPo „depend” zawsze „on”: it depends on you. „Of” się tu nie pojawia.EN“Depend” always takes “on”: it depends on you. “Of” never appears here.
listen to
A1
incorrect: I like listening music.correct: I like listening to music.
PL„Listen” wymaga „to” przed dopełnieniem: listen to music, listen to me.EN“Listen” needs “to” before its object: listen to music, listen to me.
married to
B1
incorrect: She's married with a doctor.correct: She's married to a doctor.
PLMówimy „married to”, nie „married with”: she's married to a doctor.ENIt's “married to”, not “married with”: she's married to a doctor.
arrive at / in
B1
incorrect: We arrived to the airport.correct: We arrived at the airport.
PL„Arrive at” przed punktem (lotnisko, dworzec), „arrive in” przed miastem lub krajem. Nigdy „arrive to”.EN“Arrive at” a point (airport, station), “arrive in” a city or country. Never “arrive to”.
incorrect: We arrived to Madrid at noon.correct: We arrived in Madrid at noon.
in the afternoon
A2
incorrect: At the afternoon I phoned my girlfriend.correct: In the afternoon I phoned my girlfriend.
PLO porze dnia mówimy „in the afternoon”. Z dniem tygodnia — „on”: on Tuesday afternoon. Przed „this / tomorrow afternoon” przyimek znika.ENIt's “in the afternoon” for the time of day, but “on” with a weekday: on Tuesday afternoon. Before “this / tomorrow afternoon” the preposition disappears.
incorrect: He is arriving at tomorrow afternoon.correct: He is arriving tomorrow afternoon.
incorrect: I'll call you on this afternoon.correct: I'll call you this afternoon.
a lot of
A1
incorrect: A lot people enjoy travelling.correct: A lot of people enjoy travelling.
PLPrzed rzeczą, której jest dużo, musi stać „of”: a lot of people, a lot of questions. Działa z policzalnymi i niepoliczalnymi.ENThe “of” must come before the thing there's a lot of: a lot of people, a lot of questions. Works with countables and uncountables alike.
incorrect: I don't have a lot friends in my class.correct: I don't have a lot of friends in my class.
discuss (no about)
B2
incorrect: Let's discuss about the plan.correct: Let's discuss the plan.
PL„Discuss” bierze dopełnienie bez przyimka: discuss the plan. „About” łączy się z „talk”: talk about the plan.EN“Discuss” takes its object directly: discuss the plan. “About” belongs with “talk”: talk about the plan.

Constructions

I agree
A2
incorrect: I am agree with you.correct: I agree with you.
PL„Agree” jest czasownikiem, nie przymiotnikiem — bez „am”: I agree, she agrees, do you agree?EN“Agree” is a verb, not an adjective — no “am”: I agree, she agrees, do you agree?
explain it to me
B1
incorrect: Explain me the rule.correct: Explain the rule to me.
PL„Explain” wymaga „to” przed osobą: explain the rule to me — nie „explain me”.EN“Explain” needs “to” before the person: explain the rule to me — never “explain me”.
look forward to -ing
B1
incorrect: I look forward to see you.correct: I look forward to seeing you.
PLW „look forward to” słowo „to” jest przyimkiem, więc dalej stoi -ing: looking forward to seeing you.ENIn “look forward to” the “to” is a preposition, so -ing follows: looking forward to seeing you.
See in the Lang Lab: look
incorrect: We're looking forward to he arriving next week.correct: We're looking forward to him arriving next week.

Tip The classic formal email sign-off: I look forward to hearing from you.

want you to…
B1
incorrect: I want that you help me.correct: I want you to help me.
PLPo „want” nie ma zdania z „that” — jest dopełnienie i bezokolicznik: I want you to help me.EN“Want” takes no “that”-clause — it takes an object and an infinitive: I want you to help me.
make me wait
B1
incorrect: She made me to wait.correct: She made me wait.
PLPo „make” i „let” bezokolicznik traci „to”: she made me wait, let me go.ENAfter “make” and “let” the infinitive drops its “to”: she made me wait, let me go.
enjoy + -ing
B1
incorrect: I always enjoy to cook.correct: I always enjoy cooking.
PLPo enjoy, finish, avoid, mind, keep (on), practise stoi -ing, nie bezokolicznik: enjoy cooking, keep changing.ENAfter enjoy, finish, avoid, mind, keep (on), practise comes -ing, not the infinitive: enjoy cooking, keep changing.
incorrect: We haven't finished to eat yet.correct: We haven't finished eating yet.

Tip With a new subject the pronoun takes the object form: do you mind me being here?

would love to
B1
incorrect: We would love hearing you sing.correct: We would love to hear you sing.
PLHate, like, love i prefer łączą się z -ing albo z to, ale po would / 'd — wyłącznie to-infinitive: I'd love to, I'd hate to, I'd prefer to.ENHate, like, love and prefer take -ing or to, but after would / 'd it's the to-infinitive only: I'd love to, I'd hate to, I'd prefer to.
incorrect: I'd prefer not giving you my name.correct: I'd prefer not to give you my name.

Tip Without would: -ing stresses the activity itself (I love cooking), to — a habit or preference (I like to drink juice in the morning).

stop doing vs stop to do
B1
incorrect: It stopped to rain, so we went for a walk.correct: It stopped raining, so we went for a walk.
PLStop + -ing = czynność się kończy (przestało padać). Stop + to = zatrzymać się, ŻEBY coś zrobić: we stopped to buy some water.ENStop + -ing = the activity ends (the rain stopped). Stop + to = stop in order to do something: we stopped to buy some water.
incorrect: On the way we stopped looking at an old castle.correct: On the way we stopped to look at an old castle.

Tip Try, remember, go on and mean shift meaning the same way: I tried searching (experimented) vs I tried to email (attempted and failed).

hear / see someone do
B2
incorrect: She heard the doorbell to ring.correct: She heard the doorbell ring.
PLPo hear, see, watch, notice + dopełnienie stoi bezokolicznik bez „to” (całe zdarzenie: saw her drive off) albo -ing (w trakcie: heard him coming up the stairs).ENAfter hear, see, watch, notice + object comes the bare infinitive (the whole event: saw her drive off) or -ing (in progress: heard him coming up the stairs).
incorrect: I can hear people to talk.correct: I can hear people talking.
incorrect: I watched the woman came out of the house.correct: I watched the woman come out of the house.

Tip After can / could it's always -ing: I can hear people talking.

help someone (to) do
B1
incorrect: I'm trying to help him looking for a new bike.correct: I'm trying to help him look for a new bike.
PLPo help + osoba stoi bezokolicznik — z „to” albo bez: help me tidy / help me to tidy. Nigdy -ing.ENAfter help + person comes the infinitive — with or without “to”: help me tidy / help me to tidy. Never -ing.

Word order

do it again
A2
incorrect: I hope you will again visit us.correct: I hope you will visit us again.
PL„Again” stoi po dopełnieniu: visit us again, read it again — nie między czasownikiem a dopełnieniem. Przed określeniem czasu idzie pierwsze: see you again soon.EN“Again” follows the object: visit us again, read it again — not between the verb and its object. Before a time word it comes first: see you again soon.
incorrect: I hope to see you soon again.correct: I hope to see you again soon.

Tip With no object, “again” lands at the end: he's come back again.

they all went
B1
incorrect: My friends went all to the cinema yesterday.correct: My friends all went to the cinema yesterday.
PL„All” stoi przed głównym czasownikiem (they all went) albo przed podmiotem (all my friends went). Po formach „be” — za nimi: my brothers are all taller.EN“All” goes before the main verb (they all went) or before the subject (all my friends went). After forms of “be” it follows: my brothers are all taller.
incorrect: We all are missing you.correct: We are all missing you.
incorrect: The candidates all have worked in the field for years.correct: The candidates have all worked in the field for years.
almost + verb
B1
incorrect: I failed almost the exam.correct: I almost failed the exam.
PL„Almost” stoi tuż przed głównym czasownikiem: I almost failed. Po formach „be” idzie za czasownikiem (I am almost as tall), a w present perfect — między „have” a czasownikiem (he has almost finished).EN“Almost” goes right before the main verb: I almost failed. After forms of “be” it follows the verb (I am almost as tall), and in the present perfect it sits between “have” and the verb (he has almost finished).
incorrect: He almost has finished the project.correct: He has almost finished the project.
incorrect: There is a pub almost in every village.correct: There is a pub in almost every village.

Tip “Almost” doesn't sit before a preposition either: in almost every village, not “almost in every village”.

enjoy it a lot
A2
incorrect: I enjoy a lot visiting my grandmother.correct: I enjoy visiting my grandmother a lot.
PL„A lot” nie wchodzi między czasownik a dopełnienie — idzie za nie, zwykle na sam koniec: I enjoyed the concert a lot.EN“A lot” doesn't come between the verb and its object — it follows them, usually at the very end: I enjoyed the concert a lot.
incorrect: I enjoyed a lot the concert.correct: I enjoyed the concert a lot.
already + verb
A2
incorrect: We have already enough supermarkets in this town.correct: We already have enough supermarkets in this town.
PL„Already” stoi przed głównym czasownikiem: we already have. Po formach „be” — za nimi (there are already…), a w present perfect między „have” a czasownikiem: we have already decided.EN“Already” goes before the main verb: we already have. After forms of “be” it follows (there are already…), and in the present perfect it sits between “have” and the verb: we have already decided.
incorrect: We already have decided to come back next year.correct: We have already decided to come back next year.

Tip The same “have” is once the main verb (we already have), once an auxiliary (we have already decided) — hence the two positions.

also + verb
A2
incorrect: I like dogs, but I like also cats.correct: I like dogs, but I also like cats.
PL„Also” stoi przed głównym czasownikiem: I also like. Po formach „be” — za nimi: I am also fond. W czasach złożonych — między posiłkowym a czasownikiem: has also changed.EN“Also” goes before the main verb: I also like. After forms of “be” it follows: I am also fond. In compound tenses it sits between the auxiliary and the verb: has also changed.
incorrect: Scientists also are working to solve this problem.correct: Scientists are also working to solve this problem.
even + verb
B1
incorrect: I said “Hello”, but he even didn't look at me.correct: I said “Hello”, but he didn't even look at me.
PL„Even” stoi przed głównym czasownikiem: he didn't even look. Po formach „be” — za nimi (he is even rude), a w czasach złożonych — między posiłkowym a czasownikiem: we have even won one.EN“Even” goes before the main verb: he didn't even look. After forms of “be” it follows (he is even rude), and in compound tenses it sits between the auxiliary and the verb: we have even won one.
incorrect: He even is rude to his parents.correct: He is even rude to his parents.
incorrect: Some of them even are living abroad now.correct: Some of them are even living abroad now.
warm enough / enough money
A2
incorrect: The water isn't enough warm.correct: The water isn't warm enough.
PLPo przymiotniku i przysłówku „enough” stoi ZA nim: warm enough, quickly enough. Przed rzeczownikiem — przed nim: enough money, enough time.ENWith adjectives and adverbs “enough” follows them: warm enough, quickly enough. With nouns it comes first: enough money, enough time.
incorrect: We don't have money enough.correct: We don't have enough money.
too = also (at the end)
A2
incorrect: Too I like jazz.correct: I like jazz too.
PL„Too” w znaczeniu „też” stoi na końcu zdania: I like jazz too. Nie otwiera zdania — na początku sprawdzi się „also”: Also, I like jazz.EN“Too” meaning “also” goes at the end of the clause: I like jazz too. It doesn't open a sentence — use “also” there: Also, I like jazz.
incorrect: She speaks too French.correct: She speaks French too.

Tip Before an adjective “too” means “excessively”: too easy. Position changes the meaning.

always + verb
A2
incorrect: He comes always late.correct: He always comes late.
PL„Always” i inne przysłówki częstotliwości stoją przed głównym czasownikiem: he always comes. Po formach „be” — za nimi: he is always late.EN“Always” and other frequency adverbs go before the main verb: he always comes. After forms of “be” they follow: he is always late.
incorrect: Always she is happy.correct: She is always happy.

Tip The same rule covers usually, often, never, sometimes.